Manufacturing
From 30% to 5%: how a manufacturing SME took back control of its order process
Process Audit · Redesign · Guided Automation · Duration: 14 weeks
In summary
The context
Manufacturing SME
30 people
8 years of history
Order process never redesigned
The problem
30% of orders with manual intervention
Unwritten procedures per department
Errors with no traceable origin
The result
Manual interventions under 5%
Standardised and automated process
Double the volume with the same people
Context
The context
A manufacturing company with 30 employees, active for over 8 years in industrial components. Grown well but organically, never stopping to redesign how it worked.
The order management process was born when the company had 8 people. It had never been updated. Over time, each department developed its own unwritten procedures to handle exceptions — and the exceptions had become the norm.
Analysis
The problem
When we started the Audit, the first thing I did was ask the owner: "In your view, how many orders require manual intervention?"
The answer: "Maybe 10-15%. The difficult cases."
When we actually counted, it was 30%.
The problem wasn't anyone's ill will. It was that the process had too many points where information could be incomplete, ambiguous, or simply in the wrong place. And everyone had developed their own personal way of handling the situation — which worked as long as that person was there.
What the Audit found
6 manual steps in the order flow that could be eliminated or standardised
3 systems not integrated with each other — data was copied by hand
4 people with different procedures for the same process step
No metric to know where errors originated
Intervention
The intervention
Phase 1 Audit
weeks 1–3
Interviews with the owner, the sales manager and three process operators. Complete mapping of the order flow from the client's arrival to delivery confirmation. Identification of the 6 critical steps and the 3 missing integration points between systems. Delivery of the prioritised action plan.
Phase 2 Redesign
weeks 4–9
Workshop with the operational team to redesign the process together — not alone. Elimination of 4 of the 6 identified manual steps. Definition of a single standard flow with clear responsibilities for each stage and explicit criteria for handling exceptions without inventing personal procedures.
Phase 3 Automation
weeks 10–14
Implementation of three automated flows on n8n: order receipt and validation, automatic notification to the production department, update of the management system with no manual intervention. Training for the responsible team and a 3-week post-launch follow-up.
Results
The results
30% → 5%
Manual interventions on orders
−75%
Handling time per order
×2
Volume handled with the same people
What concretely changed
Today 95% of orders are processed without anyone having to intervene manually. The team that used to spend 3-4 hours a day on this task now only handles exceptions — less than 5% of cases.
The process is documented: a new hire understands how it works without having to ask someone who "has always known."
And for the first time the company has a clear metric on this process — they know how many orders come in, how many are processed automatically, where the exceptions emerge and why.
Something I didn't expect
The result the owner mentioned most often in the weeks after launch wasn't the 5%. It was that he finally understood what was happening in his process in real time, with data.
Before, he managed by gut feeling. Now he manages with information. For him, that was the real difference.
Does your situation remind you of this case?
It doesn't have to be identical. Tell me what your process looks like now and I'll tell you honestly whether I can help.
Write to me →